85 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
85 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# GEMINI ENTRY POINT
|
|
|
|
You are Gemini (Antigravity), operating on the TFM aInventory project.
|
|
|
|
**IMMEDIATE MANDATORY ACTION:**
|
|
Before taking any action or writing code, you MUST read the following Single Source of Truth files:
|
|
1. `AI_RULES.md` (Contains your operational constraints, Git rules, and UI fidelity laws).
|
|
2. `PROJECT_ARCHITECTURE.md` (Contains the tech stack, data models, and system logic).
|
|
3. `dev_docs/SESSION_STATE.md` (Contains the current handover status from the previous AI).
|
|
|
|
**STRICT COMMUNICATION RULE:**
|
|
Be concise! Do not explain a thousand details unless they are absolutely necessary.
|
|
|
|
Do not proceed with any task until you have analyzed these three files.
|
|
|
|
DO NOT, EVER, USE "uppercase" "toUpper" in any context. Nowhere. Where it exists, DELETE it! This SHOULD NOT be used in UI/UX anywhere, no text should be displayed in CAPITAL LETTERS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
# GEMINI.md
|
|
|
|
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
|
|
|
|
**Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
|
|
|
|
## 1. Think Before Coding
|
|
|
|
**Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.**
|
|
|
|
Before implementing:
|
|
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
|
|
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
|
|
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
|
|
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
|
|
|
|
## 2. Simplicity First
|
|
|
|
**Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.**
|
|
|
|
- No features beyond what was asked.
|
|
- No abstractions for single-use code.
|
|
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
|
|
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
|
|
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
|
|
|
|
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
|
|
|
|
## 3. Surgical Changes
|
|
|
|
**Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.**
|
|
|
|
When editing existing code:
|
|
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
|
|
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
|
|
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
|
|
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
|
|
|
|
When your changes create orphans:
|
|
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
|
|
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
|
|
|
|
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
|
|
|
|
## 4. Goal-Driven Execution
|
|
|
|
**Define success criteria. Loop until verified.**
|
|
|
|
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
|
|
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
|
|
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
|
|
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
|
|
|
|
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
|
|
```
|
|
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
|
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
|
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**These guidelines are working if:** fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
|
|
|