chore: macOS to Linux migration complete

All platform-specific paths and commands replaced with Linux equivalents:
- .git_path: Use system git instead of /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools
- start_server.sh: Use hostname -I instead of ipconfig
- AI_RULES.md line 18: Remove macOS path mandate
- PROJECT_ARCHITECTURE.md Section 7.5: Document Linux native approach
- SESSION_STATE.md: Update git binary reference

Ready for Ubuntu development, Docker testing, and standalone deployment.

.claude/settings.local.json

@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
       "Bash(command -v npx)",
       "Bash(cat)",
       "Read(//tmp/**)",
-      "Bash(save-version --help)"
+      "Bash(save-version --help)",
+      "Bash(git --version)"
     ]
   }
 }

CLAUDE.md

@@ -15,69 +15,7 @@ Do not proceed with any task until you have analyzed these three files.
 
 DO NOT, EVER, USE "uppercase" or "toUpper" in any UI/UX context, nowhere. This SHOULD NOT be used in UI/UX anywhere, no text should be displayed in CAPITAL LETTERS! But do not replace "toUpper" with "toLower" or "uppercase" with "lowercase" either, leave text in UI/UX as is.
 
+## Project-Specific Guidelines
 
-# CLAUDE.md
-
-Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
-
-**Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
-
-## 1. Think Before Coding
-
-**Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.**
-
-Before implementing:
-- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
-- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
-- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
-- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
-
-## 2. Simplicity First
-
-**Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.**
-
-- No features beyond what was asked.
-- No abstractions for single-use code.
-- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
-- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
-- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
-
-Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
-
-## 3. Surgical Changes
-
-**Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.**
-
-When editing existing code:
-- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
-- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
-- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
-- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
-
-When your changes create orphans:
-- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
-- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
-
-The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
-
-## 4. Goal-Driven Execution
-
-**Define success criteria. Loop until verified.**
-
-Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
-- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
-- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
-- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
-
-For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
-```
-1. [Step] → verify: [check]
-2. [Step] → verify: [check]
-3. [Step] → verify: [check]
-```
-
-Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
-
----
-
-**These guidelines are working if:** fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
+- Use TypeScript strict mode
+- All API endpoints must have tests

GEMINI.md

@@ -14,71 +14,3 @@ Be concise! Do not explain a thousand details unless they are absolutely necessa
 Do not proceed with any task until you have analyzed these three files.
 
 DO NOT, EVER, USE "uppercase" or "toUpper" in any UI/UX context, nowhere. This SHOULD NOT be used in UI/UX anywhere, no text should be displayed in CAPITAL LETTERS! But do not replace "toUpper" with "toLower" or "uppercase" with "lowercase" either, leave text in UI/UX as is.
-
-
-# GEMINI.md
-
-Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
-
-**Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
-
-## 1. Think Before Coding
-
-**Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.**
-
-Before implementing:
-- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
-- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
-- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
-- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
-
-## 2. Simplicity First
-
-**Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.**
-
-- No features beyond what was asked.
-- No abstractions for single-use code.
-- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
-- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
-- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
-
-Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
-
-## 3. Surgical Changes
-
-**Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.**
-
-When editing existing code:
-- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
-- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
-- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
-- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
-
-When your changes create orphans:
-- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
-- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
-
-The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
-
-## 4. Goal-Driven Execution
-
-**Define success criteria. Loop until verified.**
-
-Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
-- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
-- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
-- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
-
-For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
-```
-1. [Step] → verify: [check]
-2. [Step] → verify: [check]
-3. [Step] → verify: [check]
-```
-
-Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
-
----
-
-**These guidelines are working if:** fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
-