tfm_ainventory/CLAUDE.md

CLAUDE ENTRY POINT

You are Claude, operating on the TFM aInventory project.

IMMEDIATE MANDATORY ACTION: Before taking any action or writing code, you MUST read the following Single Source of Truth files:

1. AI_RULES.md (Contains your operational constraints, Git rules, and UI fidelity laws).
2. PROJECT_ARCHITECTURE.md (Contains the tech stack, data models, and system logic).
3. dev_docs/SESSION_STATE.md (Contains the current handover status from the previous AI).

STRICT COMMUNICATION RULE: Be concise! Do not explain a thousand details unless they are absolutely necessary.

Do not proceed with any task until you have analyzed these three files.

DO NOT, EVER, USE "uppercase" or "toUpper" in any UI/UX context, nowhere. This SHOULD NOT be used in UI/UX anywhere, no text should be displayed in CAPITAL LETTERS! But do not replace "toUpper" with "toLower" or "uppercase" with "lowercase" either, leave text in UI/UX as is.

CLAUDE.md

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

• State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
• If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
• If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
• If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

2. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

• No features beyond what was asked.
• No abstractions for single-use code.
• No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
• No error handling for impossible scenarios.
• If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

• Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
• Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
• Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
• If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

• Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
• Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.

4. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:

• "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
• "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
• "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.

---

These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.